↓ Skip to main content

Evidence based practice profiles: Differences among allied health professions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence based practice profiles: Differences among allied health professions
Published in
BMC Medical Education, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-10-69
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maureen P McEvoy, Marie T Williams, Timothy S Olds

Abstract

Most previous studies of allied health professionals' evidence based practice (EBP) attitudes, knowledge and behaviours have been conducted with profession specific questionnaires of variable psychometric strength. This study compared the self-report EBP profiles of allied health professionals/trainees in an Australian university.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
France 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Croatia 1 1%
Unknown 83 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 17%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 6 7%
Other 26 28%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 24%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Sports and Recreations 6 7%
Psychology 5 5%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 19 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2012.
All research outputs
#15,242,847
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,251
of 3,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,515
of 98,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.