You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Power and sample size determination for the group comparison of patient-reported outcomes using the Rasch model: impact of a misspecification of the parameters
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-015-0011-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Myriam Blanchin, Alice Guilleux, Bastien Perrot, Angélique Bonnaud-Antignac, Jean-Benoit Hardouin, Véronique Sébille |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 32% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,258,028
of 23,168,000 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#702
of 2,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,028
of 262,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,168,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.