You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modifying ankle foot orthosis stiffness in patients with calf muscle weakness: gait responses on group and individual level
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-019-0600-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Niels F. J. Waterval, Frans Nollet, Jaap Harlaar, Merel-Anne Brehm |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 53 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 18 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 59 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,740,042
of 23,882,990 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#275
of 1,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,454
of 358,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,882,990 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.