↓ Skip to main content

Fever screening during the influenza (H1N1-2009) pandemic at Narita International Airport, Japan

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fever screening during the influenza (H1N1-2009) pandemic at Narita International Airport, Japan
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-11-111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroshi Nishiura, Kazuko Kamiya

Abstract

Entry screening tends to start with a search for febrile international passengers, and infrared thermoscanners have been employed for fever screening in Japan. We aimed to retrospectively assess the feasibility of detecting influenza cases based on fever screening as a sole measure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 108 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 20%
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 8 7%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 18 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 11%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 26 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 134. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2021.
All research outputs
#277,429
of 23,724,077 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#71
of 7,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#889
of 112,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,724,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.