You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reducing the use of seclusion for mental disorder in a prison: implementing a high support unit in a prison using participant action research
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1752-4458-6-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yvette Giblin, Andy Kelly, Enda Kelly, Harry G Kennedy, Damian Mohan |
Abstract |
Vulnerable prisoners and mentally disordered offenders who present with risk of harm to self or others were accommodated in Special Observation Cells (SOCs) isolated from others for considerable periods of time. This practice has been criticised by the Council of Europe Committee for the Prevention of Torture. The objective of this initiative was to reduce the use of seclusion within the prison and to improve the care of vulnerable and mentally ill prisoners within the prison. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
Canada | 2 | 13% |
New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
Ireland | 1 | 7% |
Australia | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 113 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 16% |
Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
Other | 20 | 17% |
Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 42 | 37% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 8% |
Unknown | 31 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,121,445
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#97
of 759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,361
of 173,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them