You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Cognitive functioning in patients with classical galactosemia: a systematic review
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, October 2019
Merel E. Hermans, Mendy M. Welsink-Karssies, Annet M. Bosch, Kim J. Oostrom, Gert J. Geurtsen
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||6||13%|
|Student > Master||4||9%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Nursing and Health Professions||5||11%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||3||7%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||3||7%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||1||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,168,000 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
of 2,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 356,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,168,000 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.