You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Are baseline ultrasound and mammographic features associated with rates of pathological completes response in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer?
Cancer Imaging, October 2019
Sarah L. Savaridas, Yee Ting Sim, Sarah J. Vinnicombe, Colin A. Purdie, Alastair M. Thompson, Andy Evans
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||27%|
|Student > Bachelor||1||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||6||55%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||9%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||9%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,168,000 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Imaging
of 607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 357,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Imaging
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,168,000 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 607 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.