↓ Skip to main content

Pigs receiving daily tailored diets using precision-feeding techniques have different threonine requirements than pigs fed in conventional phase-feeding systems

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pigs receiving daily tailored diets using precision-feeding techniques have different threonine requirements than pigs fed in conventional phase-feeding systems
Published in
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40104-019-0328-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aline Remus, Luciano Hauschild, Etienne Corrent, Marie-Pierre Létourneau-Montminy, Candido Pomar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 19%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 16 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 36%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 7%
Engineering 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2019.
All research outputs
#15,526,423
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#266
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,144
of 367,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.