You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phenotyping viral infection in sweetpotato using a high-throughput chlorophyll fluorescence and thermal imaging platform
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-019-0501-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linping Wang, Sylvain Poque, Jari P. T. Valkonen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 2 | 33% |
| Colombia | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,782,020
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#576
of 1,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,484
of 374,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#19
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.