You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Fast self-navigated wall shear stress measurements in the murine aortic arch using radial 4D-phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 17.6 T
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-019-0566-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Patrick Winter, Kristina Andelovic, Thomas Kampf, Fabian Tobias Gutjahr, Julius Heidenreich, Alma Zernecke, Wolfgang Rudolf Bauer, Peter Michael Jakob, Volker Herold |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 17% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 22% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Psychology | 1 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2019.
All research outputs
#20,775,306
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,191
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,902
of 369,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#20
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.