↓ Skip to main content

Rearfoot and forefoot footfall patterns: implications for barefoot running

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rearfoot and forefoot footfall patterns: implications for barefoot running
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-5-s1-k1
Authors

Joseph Hamill

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 20%
Researcher 3 15%
Other 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 6 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 30%
Engineering 3 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2012.
All research outputs
#3,885,840
of 19,298,685 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#315
of 683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,759
of 136,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,298,685 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them