You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Socioeconomic inequalities in the use of caesarean section delivery in Ghana: a cross-sectional study using nationally representative data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12939-019-1063-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emmanuel Dankwah, Shelley Kirychuk, Wu Zeng, Cindy Feng, Marwa Farag |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 183 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 77 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 77 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2019.
All research outputs
#14,461,222
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,464
of 1,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,667
of 361,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#41
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.