You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relational autonomy: what does it mean and how is it used in end-of-life care? A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-019-0417-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlos Gómez-Vírseda, Yves de Maeseneer, Chris Gastmans |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 31% |
| Austria | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Belgium | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 225 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Researcher | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 17% |
| Unknown | 76 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 10% |
| Psychology | 11 | 5% |
| Philosophy | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 81 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,196,996
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#322
of 1,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,192
of 380,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#11
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.