↓ Skip to main content

The impact of D-cycloserine and sarcosine on in vivo frontal neural activity in a schizophrenia-like model

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of D-cycloserine and sarcosine on in vivo frontal neural activity in a schizophrenia-like model
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12888-019-2306-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lulu Yao, Zongliang Wang, Di Deng, Rongzhen Yan, Jun Ju, Qiang Zhou

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Student > Master 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 30%
Psychology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2019.
All research outputs
#20,585,941
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#4,303
of 4,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,130
of 361,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#86
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.