You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Routine development of objectively derived search strategies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, February 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-1-19 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elke Hausner, Siw Waffenschmidt, Thomas Kaiser, Michael Simon |
Abstract |
Over the past few years, information retrieval has become more and more professionalized, and information specialists are considered full members of a research team conducting systematic reviews. Research groups preparing systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines have been the driving force in the development of search strategies, but open questions remain regarding the transparency of the development process and the available resources. An empirically guided approach to the development of a search strategy provides a way to increase transparency and efficiency. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
Spain | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 4 | 3% |
United States | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Uganda | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 104 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Librarian | 22 | 19% |
Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
Researcher | 16 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 8% |
Other | 27 | 23% |
Unknown | 12 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 37% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 12% |
Computer Science | 10 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 12% |
Unknown | 20 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,052,955
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#330
of 2,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,438
of 168,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.