Title |
A simple test for the cleavage activity of customized endonucleases in plants
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Methods, March 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13007-016-0118-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nagaveni Budhagatapalli, Sindy Schedel, Maia Gurushidze, Stefanie Pencs, Stefan Hiekel, Twan Rutten, Stefan Kusch, Robert Morbitzer, Thomas Lahaye, Ralph Panstruga, Jochen Kumlehn, Goetz Hensel |
Abstract |
Although customized endonucleases [transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) and RNA-guided endonucleases (RGENs)] are known to be effective agents of mutagenesis in various host plants, newly designed endonuclease constructs require some pre-validation with respect to functionality before investing in the creation of stable transgenic plants. A simple, biolistics-based leaf epidermis transient expression test has been developed, based on reconstituting the translational reading frame of a mutated, non-functional yfp reporter gene. Quantification of mutation efficacy was made possible by co-bombarding the explant with a constitutive mCherry expression cassette, thereby allowing the ratio between the number of red and yellow fluorescing cells to serve as a metric for mutation efficiency. Challenging either stable mutant alleles of a compromised version of gfp in tobacco and barley or the barley MLO gene with TALENs/RGENs confirmed the capacity to induce site-directed mutations. A convenient procedure to assay the cleavage activity of customized endonucleases has been established. The system is independent of the endonuclease platform and operates in both di- and monocotyledonous hosts. It not only enables the validation of a TALEN/RGEN's functionality prior to the creation of stable mutants, but also serves as a suitable tool to optimize the design of endonuclease constructs. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Russia | 1 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Argentina | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 69 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 20% |
Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 8 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 49% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 30% |
Philosophy | 1 | 1% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 14% |