You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6 |
| Authors |
Katy L. James, Nicola P. Randall, Neal R. Haddaway |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 29% |
| Lebanon | 2 | 6% |
| South Africa | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 69% |
| Scientists | 8 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 862 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Nepal | 1 | <1% |
| Malta | 1 | <1% |
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 852 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 160 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 150 | 17% |
| Researcher | 130 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 52 | 6% |
| Other | 106 | 12% |
| Unknown | 205 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 174 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 126 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 58 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 42 | 5% |
| Engineering | 41 | 5% |
| Other | 168 | 19% |
| Unknown | 253 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,359,734
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#44
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,476
of 316,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.