You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Debating medicalization of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C): learning from (policy) experiences across countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12978-019-0817-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Els Leye, Nina Van Eekert, Simukai Shamu, Tammary Esho, Hazel Barrett |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 146 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 19% |
| Unknown | 56 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 9% |
| Psychology | 7 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 63 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,145,642
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#213
of 1,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,136
of 368,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.