↓ Skip to main content

The war on marijuana: The transformation of the war on drugs in the 1990s

Overview of attention for article published in Harm Reduction Journal, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
16 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The war on marijuana: The transformation of the war on drugs in the 1990s
Published in
Harm Reduction Journal, February 2006
DOI 10.1186/1477-7517-3-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan S King, Marc Mauer

Abstract

As the "war on drugs" enters the latter half of its third decade since being forged into the American lexicon by President Ronald Reagan, the public has grown more skeptical of the current strategy and has proven to be receptive to a broader consideration of alternatives to incarceration. This has been the case most notably with marijuana offenses, where the policy discussion has shifted in some localities to one of decriminalization or de-prioritizing law enforcement resources dedicated to pursuing possession offenses. Despite the increased profile surrounding marijuana policy in recent years, there remains a significant degree of misunderstanding regarding the current strategy, both in terms of how resources are being allocated and to what eventual gain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 73 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 23%
Student > Master 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 28 37%
Psychology 9 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#819,343
of 25,519,924 outputs
Outputs from Harm Reduction Journal
#139
of 1,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,781
of 171,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Harm Reduction Journal
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,519,924 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them