You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Protocol for a systematic review of the use of qualitative comparative analysis for evaluative questions in public health research
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1159-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Benjamin Hanckel, Mark Petticrew, James Thomas, Judith Green |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Professor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 17 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 12 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 14% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 21 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#18,695,869
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,798
of 2,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,251
of 362,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#59
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.