↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: ‘CompGO: an R package for comparing and visualizing Gene Ontology enrichment differences between DNA binding experiments’

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: ‘CompGO: an R package for comparing and visualizing Gene Ontology enrichment differences between DNA binding experiments’
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12859-016-1048-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashley J. Waardenberg, Samuel D. Bassett, Romaric Bouveret, Richard P. Harvey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2016.
All research outputs
#6,587,192
of 7,607,694 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,172
of 3,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,937
of 267,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#100
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,607,694 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.