↓ Skip to main content

Sleep abnormalities associated with alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, and opiate use: a comprehensive review

Overview of attention for article published in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 492)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
28 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
338 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sleep abnormalities associated with alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, and opiate use: a comprehensive review
Published in
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13722-016-0056-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gustavo A. Angarita, Nazli Emadi, Sarah Hodges, Peter T. Morgan

Abstract

Sleep abnormalities are associated with acute and chronic use of addictive substances. Although sleep complaints associated with use and abstinence from addictive substances are widely recognized, familiarity with the underlying sleep abnormalities is often lacking, despite evidence that these sleep abnormalities may be recalcitrant and impede good outcomes. Substantial research has now characterized the abnormalities associated with acute and chronic use of alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, and opiates. This review summarizes this research and discusses the clinical implications of sleep abnormalities in the treatment of substance use disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 337 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 14%
Student > Bachelor 38 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 11%
Student > Master 35 10%
Student > Postgraduate 21 6%
Other 63 19%
Unknown 97 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 21%
Psychology 54 16%
Neuroscience 33 10%
Social Sciences 15 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 4%
Other 41 12%
Unknown 111 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#470,398
of 25,637,545 outputs
Outputs from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#15
of 492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,532
of 312,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,637,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them