↓ Skip to main content

Empirical studies on informal patient payments for health care services: a systematic and critical review of research methods and instruments

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Empirical studies on informal patient payments for health care services: a systematic and critical review of research methods and instruments
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, September 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-10-273
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tetiana Stepurko, Milena Pavlova, Irena Gryga, Wim Groot

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Sierra Leone 1 1%
Estonia 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 72 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Student > Master 14 18%
Researcher 10 13%
Other 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 17 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,409,097
of 25,121,016 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,210
of 8,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,412
of 102,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#18
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,121,016 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.