You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Clinical, pathological, and laboratory diagnoses of diseases of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena), live stranded on the Dutch and adjacent coasts from 2003 to 2016
Veterinary Research, October 2019
Cornelis E. van Elk, Marco W. G. van de Bildt, Peter R. W. A. van Run, Paulien Bunskoek, Jolanda Meerbeek, Geoffrey Foster, Albert D. M. E. Osterhaus, Thijs Kuiken
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||50%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||4||12%|
|Student > Master||3||9%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||7||21%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||7||21%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Research
of 1,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 362,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Research
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,212 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.