↓ Skip to main content

Personalisation schemes in social care and inequality: review of the evidence and early theorising

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
37 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Personalisation schemes in social care and inequality: review of the evidence and early theorising
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12939-019-1075-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gemma Carey, Brad Crammond, Eleanor Malbon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 21 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,405,279
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#195
of 2,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,768
of 382,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#5
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.