You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Low-flow assessment of current ECMO/ECCO2R rotary blood pumps and the potential effect on hemocompatibility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2622-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sascha Gross-Hardt, Felix Hesselmann, Jutta Arens, Ulrich Steinseifer, Leen Vercaemst, Wolfram Windisch, Daniel Brodie, Christian Karagiannidis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 19% |
| Italy | 4 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Argentina | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| India | 2 | 6% |
| Qatar | 2 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 20 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 24% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,027,286
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,814
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,718
of 381,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#27
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.