↓ Skip to main content

Origin and evolution of the Notch signalling pathway: an overview from eukaryotic genomes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
196 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
365 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Origin and evolution of the Notch signalling pathway: an overview from eukaryotic genomes
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, October 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-9-249
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eve Gazave, Pascal Lapébie, Gemma S Richards, Frédéric Brunet, Alexander V Ereskovsky, Bernard M Degnan, Carole Borchiellini, Michel Vervoort, Emmanuelle Renard

Abstract

Of the 20 or so signal transduction pathways that orchestrate cell-cell interactions in metazoans, seven are involved during development. One of these is the Notch signalling pathway which regulates cellular identity, proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis via the developmental processes of lateral inhibition and boundary induction. In light of this essential role played in metazoan development, we surveyed a wide range of eukaryotic genomes to determine the origin and evolution of the components and auxiliary factors that compose and modulate this pathway.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 365 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 345 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 25%
Researcher 70 19%
Student > Bachelor 40 11%
Student > Master 35 10%
Professor 19 5%
Other 54 15%
Unknown 56 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 159 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 100 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 2%
Engineering 5 1%
Other 21 6%
Unknown 64 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,121,800
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#829
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,951
of 105,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.