↓ Skip to main content

How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
57 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches
Published in
Systematic Reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13643-019-1188-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberta W. Scherer, Ian J. Saldanha

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Librarian 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Computer Science 7 7%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Psychology 5 5%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 27 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2021.
All research outputs
#901,438
of 21,507,731 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#136
of 1,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,631
of 351,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#19
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,507,731 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.