↓ Skip to main content

Anterograde catheterization of severe tracheal stenosis as a difficult airway management option, followed by emergent tracheostomy (a case report)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anterograde catheterization of severe tracheal stenosis as a difficult airway management option, followed by emergent tracheostomy (a case report)
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13019-016-0471-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Behrad Ziapour

Abstract

To describe the successful management of a patient with severe dyspnea and hypoxia due to tracheal stenosis by the application of a novel bridging technique-anterograde tracheal catheterization-prior to tracheostomy. A 55-year-old woman entered the Emergency Department with severe dyspnea, tachypnea, and stridor and a pulse oximetry reading of 60 %. An attempt at intubation failed because of tracheal stenosis discovered 3-4 cm distal to the vocal cords, which had been formed as a complication of intubation the previous month. Cricothyrotomy could not be applied for failed airway management because the stenosis had formed distal to the cricothyroid membrane. Laryngeal mask airway ventilation did not improve the oxygenation to more than an arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 70 %. Thus, anterograde insertion of a 12-F double-lumen central venous catheter was attempted, which sealed the 2-mm orifice of the stricture. Bag-valve-mask ventilation with this latter mode provided 80 % saturation as a bridge to an emergent bed-side tracheostomy. "Anterograde tracheal catheterization" appears to be a relatively effective and easy-to-perform option for oxygenation in such tracheal stenosis cases before a definite but time-consuming tracheostomy can secure the airway.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 25%
Other 4 17%
Student > Postgraduate 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Lecturer 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2016.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#650
of 1,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,610
of 312,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#12
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,382 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.