↓ Skip to main content

Overweight in the Pacific: links between foreign dependence, global food trade, and obesity in the Federated States of Micronesia

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Overweight in the Pacific: links between foreign dependence, global food trade, and obesity in the Federated States of Micronesia
Published in
Globalization and Health, July 2006
DOI 10.1186/1744-8603-2-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan Cassels

Abstract

The Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) has received considerable attention for their alarming rates of overweight and obesity. On Kosrae, one of the four districts in the FSM, 88% of adults aged 20 or older are overweight (BMI > 25), 59% are obese (BMI > 30), and 24% are extremely obese (BMI > 35). Recent genetic studies in Kosrae have shown that obesity is a highly heritable trait, and more work is underway to identify obesity genes in humans. However, less attention has been given to potential social and developmental causes of obesity in the FSM. This paper outlines the long history of foreign rule and social change over the last 100 years, and suggests that a combination of dietary change influenced by foreigners, dependence on foreign aid, and the ease of global food trade contributed to poor diet and increased rates of obesity in Micronesia. The last section of the paper highlights the Pacific tuna trade as an example of how foreign dependence and global food trade exacerbates their obesity epidemic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Papua New Guinea 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 20%
Student > Bachelor 23 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 32 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 4%
Other 28 23%
Unknown 24 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,443,384
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#215
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,555
of 92,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them