You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
A randomized cross-over trial to determine the effect of a protein vs. carbohydrate preload on energy balance in ad libitum settings
Nutrition Journal, November 2019
Madeline J. Gibson, John A. Dawson, Nadeeja N. Wijayatunga, Bridget Ironuma, Idah Chatindiara, Fernando Ovalle, David B. Allison, Emily J. Dhurandhar
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||19||61%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||8||26%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||3%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||11||20%|
|Student > Master||7||13%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||3||5%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Nursing and Health Professions||8||15%|
|Sports and Recreations||5||9%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||5||9%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||4||7%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
of 1,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 364,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.