You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comprehensive protocol for ventilator weaning and extubation: a prospective observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40560-019-0402-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenichi Nitta, Kazufumi Okamoto, Hiroshi Imamura, Katsunori Mochizuki, Hiroshi Takayama, Hiroshi Kamijo, Mayumi Okada, Kanako Takeshige, Yuichiro Kashima, Takahisa Satou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 19% |
| Colombia | 3 | 9% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 19% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 145 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 58 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 12% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | <1% |
| Psychology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 59 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,824,803
of 25,374,374 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#91
of 576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,818
of 374,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.