You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protocol for an effectiveness- implementation hybrid trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an m-health intervention to decrease the consumption of discretionary foods packed in school lunchboxes: the ‘SWAP IT’ trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7725-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel Sutherland, Alison Brown, Nicole Nathan, Lisa Janssen, Renee Reynolds, Alison Walton, Nayerra Hudson, Amelia Chooi, Serene Yoong, John Wiggers, Andrew Bailey, Nicole Evans, Karen Gillham, Christopher Oldmeadow, Andrew Searles, Penny Reeves, Chris Rissel, Marc Davies, Kathryn Reilly, Brad Cohen, Tim McCallum, Luke Wolfenden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Ireland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 219 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 9% |
| Researcher | 11 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 94 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 100 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2021.
All research outputs
#6,156,107
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,342
of 15,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,016
of 359,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#156
of 316 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 316 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.