↓ Skip to main content

Infant siblings and the investigation of autism risk factors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Infant siblings and the investigation of autism risk factors
Published in
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1866-1955-4-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Craig J Newschaffer, Lisa A Croen, M Daniele Fallin, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Danh V Nguyen, Nora L Lee, Carmen A Berry, Homayoon Farzadegan, H Nicole Hess, Rebecca J Landa, Susan E Levy, Maria L Massolo, Stacey C Meyerer, Sandra M Mohammed, McKenzie C Oliver, Sally Ozonoff, Juhi Pandey, Adam Schroeder, Kristine M Shedd-Wise

Abstract

Infant sibling studies have been at the vanguard of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) research over the past decade, providing important new knowledge about the earliest emerging signs of ASD and expanding our understanding of the developmental course of this complex disorder. Studies focused on siblings of children with ASD also have unrealized potential for contributing to ASD etiologic research. Moving targeted time of enrollment back from infancy toward conception creates tremendous opportunities for optimally studying risk factors and risk biomarkers during the pre-, peri- and neonatal periods. By doing so, a traditional sibling study, which already incorporates close developmental follow-up of at-risk infants through the third year of life, is essentially reconfigured as an enriched-risk pregnancy cohort study. This review considers the enriched-risk pregnancy cohort approach of studying infant siblings in the context of current thinking on ASD etiologic mechanisms. It then discusses the key features of this approach and provides a description of the design and implementation strategy of one major ASD enriched-risk pregnancy cohort study: the Early Autism Risk Longitudinal Investigation (EARLI).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 137 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Other 11 8%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 22 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 28 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2014.
All research outputs
#13,128,940
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#309
of 473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,725
of 161,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.