↓ Skip to main content

Adjunctive naturopathic care for type 2 diabetes: patient-reported and clinical outcomes after one year

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
23 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
322 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adjunctive naturopathic care for type 2 diabetes: patient-reported and clinical outcomes after one year
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-12-44
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan Bradley, Karen J Sherman, Sheryl Catz, Carlo Calabrese, Erica B Oberg, Luesa Jordan, Lou Grothaus, Dan Cherkin

Abstract

Several small, uncontrolled studies have found improvements in self-care behaviors and reductions in clinical risk in persons with type 2 diabetes who received care from licensed naturopathic physicians. To extend these findings and determine the feasibility and promise of a randomized clinical trial, we conducted a prospective study to measure the effects of adjunctive naturopathic care (ANC) in primary care patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 319 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 13%
Student > Master 42 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 11%
Researcher 34 11%
Unspecified 23 7%
Other 72 22%
Unknown 71 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 15%
Unspecified 23 7%
Psychology 15 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 5%
Other 46 14%
Unknown 85 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#706,644
of 24,810,360 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#95
of 3,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,285
of 166,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#3
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,810,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.