↓ Skip to main content

Re-exploring the value of surveillance cultures in predicting pathogens of late onset neonatal sepsis in a tertiary care hospital in southern Sri Lanka

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Re-exploring the value of surveillance cultures in predicting pathogens of late onset neonatal sepsis in a tertiary care hospital in southern Sri Lanka
Published in
BMC Research Notes, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13104-018-3448-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nayani Prasangika Weerasinghe, Dhammika Vidanagama, Bilesha Perera, Herath Mudiyanselage Meththananda Herath, Ajith De Silva Nagahawatte

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Master 4 17%
Other 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 17%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Unknown 9 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,482,654
of 15,348,605 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#774
of 3,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,598
of 322,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#59
of 353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,348,605 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,398 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.