↓ Skip to main content

Is orbital floor a reliable and useful surgical landmark in endoscopic endonasal surgery?: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is orbital floor a reliable and useful surgical landmark in endoscopic endonasal surgery?: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12901-018-0060-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Baharudin Abdullah, Chew Shiun Chuen, Salina Husain, Kornkiat Snidvongs, De Yun Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 26 76%
Other 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 3%
Student > Master 1 3%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 26 76%
Computer Science 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,698,279
of 23,173,635 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
#55
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,959
of 329,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,173,635 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.