↓ Skip to main content

Transcriptomic response is more sensitive to water deficit in shoots than roots of Vitis riparia (Michx.)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcriptomic response is more sensitive to water deficit in shoots than roots of Vitis riparia (Michx.)
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12870-019-1664-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vedbar Singh Khadka, Kimberley Vaughn, Juan Xie, Padmapriya Swaminathan, Qin Ma, Grant R. Cramer, Anne Y. Fennell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 27%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 20%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2019.
All research outputs
#12,667,876
of 14,330,171 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#1,569
of 2,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,855
of 314,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#277
of 396 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,330,171 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 396 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.