↓ Skip to main content

Individual patient data meta-analysis of survival data using Poisson regression models

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Individual patient data meta-analysis of survival data using Poisson regression models
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-12-34
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J Crowther, Richard D Riley, Jan A Staessen, Jiguang Wang, Francois Gueyffier, Paul C Lambert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
France 2 2%
Japan 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 102 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 11%
Student > Master 11 10%
Professor 4 4%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 29%
Mathematics 19 17%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Computer Science 5 4%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 22 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2018.
All research outputs
#12,793,592
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,177
of 2,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,306
of 160,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#11
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.