↓ Skip to main content

Dietary intake and risk of asthma in children and adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary intake and risk of asthma in children and adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13601-016-0106-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa Garcia-Larsen, Stefano R. Del Giacco, André Moreira, Matteo Bonini, Tari Haahtela, Sergio Bonini, Kai-Håkon Carlsen, Ioana Agache, João Fonseca, Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos, Luís Delgado

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 21%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 6 25%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2016.
All research outputs
#13,030,962
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#437
of 677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,037
of 300,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.