↓ Skip to main content

Artery reopening is required for the neurorestorative effects of angiotensin modulation after experimental stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Artery reopening is required for the neurorestorative effects of angiotensin modulation after experimental stroke
Published in
Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13231-016-0018-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmed Alhusban, Anna Kozak, Wael Eldahshan, Adviye Ergul, Susan C. Fagan

Abstract

Blood flow restoration with fibrinolysis and thrombectomy is recommended to limit injury in stroke patients with proximal artery occlusion. Angiotensin receptor blockers have been shown to be neuroprotective in models of permanent and temporary occlusion, but the benefits on expression of trophic factors have been seen only when the artery is reopened. It is possible that early artery opening with endovascular intervention may increase the likelihood of identifying an effective combination therapy for patients. Normotensive male Wistar rats were subjected to mechanical middle cerebral artery occlusion (either temporary or permanent), followed by randomization to receive candesartan (0.3 mg/kg IV) or saline. Functional outcome, infarct size, and biochemical changes were assessed 24 h after ischemia induction. Lack of reperfusion blunted candesartan induced neuroprotection (p < 0.05) and reduced the improvement of functional outcome (p < 0.05). With reperfusion, candesartan increased mature BDNF expression in the contralateral hemisphere (p < 0.05) and activated prosurvival (Akt-GSK3-β) signaling (p < 0.05). Without reperfusion, candesartan significantly reduced VEGF expression and MMP activation and increased NOGO A expression, creating an environment hostile to recovery. Candesartan induced pro-recovery effects are dependent on the presence of reperfusion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2016.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine
#41
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,835
of 312,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them