↓ Skip to main content

Statistical properties of interval mapping methods on quantitative trait loci location: impact on QTL/eQTL analyses

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomic Data, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statistical properties of interval mapping methods on quantitative trait loci location: impact on QTL/eQTL analyses
Published in
BMC Genomic Data, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2156-13-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoqiang Wang, Hélène Gilbert, Carole Moreno, Olivier Filangi, Jean-Michel Elsen, Pascale Le Roy

Abstract

Quantitative trait loci (QTL) detection on a huge amount of phenotypes, like eQTL detection on transcriptomic data, can be dramatically impaired by the statistical properties of interval mapping methods. One of these major outcomes is the high number of QTL detected at marker locations. The present study aims at identifying and specifying the sources of this bias, in particular in the case of analysis of data issued from outbred populations. Analytical developments were carried out in a backcross situation in order to specify the bias and to propose an algorithm to control it. The outbred population context was studied through simulated data sets in a wide range of situations.The likelihood ratio test was firstly analyzed under the "one QTL" hypothesis in a backcross population. Designs of sib families were then simulated and analyzed using the QTL Map software. On the basis of the theoretical results in backcross, parameters such as the population size, the density of the genetic map, the QTL effect and the true location of the QTL, were taken into account under the "no QTL" and the "one QTL" hypotheses. A combination of two non parametric tests - the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test - was used in order to identify the parameters that affected the bias and to specify how much they influenced the estimation of QTL location.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iraq 1 3%
New Zealand 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Belgium 1 3%
Unknown 27 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 45%
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 68%
Engineering 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2012.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomic Data
#861
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,951
of 173,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomic Data
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.