You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Evaluation of honey-baited FTA cards in combination with different mosquito traps in an area of low arbovirus prevalence
Parasites & Vectors, November 2019
Nadja C. Wipf, Valeria Guidi, Mauro Tonolla, Michela Ruinelli, Pie Müller, Olivier Engler
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||13||68%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||5%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||8||12%|
|Student > Master||6||9%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||5||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||14||21%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||12||18%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||4||6%|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||3||4%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||3||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2019.
All research outputs
of 24,525,936 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
of 5,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 467,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.