↓ Skip to main content

Prospective trial examining safety and efficacy of microcurrent stimulation for the treatment of sinus pain and congestion

Overview of attention for article published in Bioelectronic Medicine, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 114)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prospective trial examining safety and efficacy of microcurrent stimulation for the treatment of sinus pain and congestion
Published in
Bioelectronic Medicine, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s42234-019-0035-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan B. Goldsobel, Niveditha Prabhakar, Blake T. Gurfein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Master 4 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Other 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 24%
Engineering 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2023.
All research outputs
#773,693
of 23,706,059 outputs
Outputs from Bioelectronic Medicine
#12
of 114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,382
of 461,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioelectronic Medicine
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,706,059 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.