You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ChromNet: Learning the human chromatin network from all ENCODE ChIP-seq data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-016-0925-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Scott M. Lundberg, William B. Tu, Brian Raught, Linda Z. Penn, Michael M. Hoffman, Su-In Lee |
| Abstract |
A cell's epigenome arises from interactions among regulatory factors-transcription factors and histone modifications-co-localized at particular genomic regions. We developed a novel statistical method, ChromNet, to infer a network of these interactions, the chromatin network, by inferring conditional-dependence relationships among a large number of ChIP-seq data sets. We applied ChromNet to all available 1451 ChIP-seq data sets from the ENCODE Project, and showed that ChromNet revealed previously known physical interactions better than alternative approaches. We experimentally validated one of the previously unreported interactions, MYC-HCFC1. An interactive visualization tool is available at http://chromnet.cs.washington.edu . |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 54% |
| Scientists | 17 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 145 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 26% |
| Computer Science | 28 | 18% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,728,707
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,428
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,023
of 312,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#34
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.