↓ Skip to main content

A new forum for research on research integrity and peer review

Overview of attention for article published in Research Integrity and Peer Review, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 103)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
39 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A new forum for research on research integrity and peer review
Published in
Research Integrity and Peer Review, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s41073-016-0010-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie L. Harriman, Maria K. Kowalczuk, Iveta Simera, Elizabeth Wager

Abstract

This editorial explains why we are launchingResearch Integrity and Peer Review, a new open-access journal that will provide a home to research on ethics, reporting, and evaluation of research. We discuss how the idea to launch this journal came about and identify the gaps in knowledge where we would like to encourage more research and interdisciplinary discussion. We are particularly keen to receive submissions presenting actual research that will increase our understanding and suggest potential solutions to issues related to peer review, study reporting, and research and publication ethics.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 33%
Other 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Social Sciences 2 33%
Psychology 1 17%
Computer Science 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#678,465
of 18,394,878 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#36
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,193
of 271,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,394,878 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them