↓ Skip to main content

Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use

Overview of attention for article published in Research Integrity and Peer Review, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 133)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
blogs
13 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
283 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
963 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
926 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use
Published in
Research Integrity and Peer Review, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s41073-016-0007-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shirin Heidari, Thomas F. Babor, Paola De Castro, Sera Tort, Mirjam Curno

Abstract

Sex and gender differences are often overlooked in research design, study implementation and scientific reporting, as well as in general science communication. This oversight limits the generalizability of research findings and their applicability to clinical practice, in particular for women but also for men. This article describes the rationale for an international set of guidelines to encourage a more systematic approach to the reporting of sex and gender in research across disciplines. A panel of 13 experts representing nine countries developed the guidelines through a series of teleconferences, conference presentations and a 2-day workshop. An internet survey of 716 journal editors, scientists and other members of the international publishing community was conducted as well as a literature search on sex and gender policies in scientific publishing. The Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines are a comprehensive procedure for reporting of sex and gender information in study design, data analyses, results and interpretation of findings. The SAGER guidelines are designed primarily to guide authors in preparing their manuscripts, but they are also useful for editors, as gatekeepers of science, to integrate assessment of sex and gender into all manuscripts as an integral part of the editorial process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 283 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 926 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 920 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 139 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 117 13%
Student > Master 103 11%
Student > Bachelor 66 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 4%
Other 155 17%
Unknown 307 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 139 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 83 9%
Social Sciences 63 7%
Psychology 50 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 4%
Other 203 22%
Unknown 353 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 440. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#64,849
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#3
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,269
of 313,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 58.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them