You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pelvic floor muscle training and adjunctive therapies for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Women's Health, June 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6874-6-11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patricia B Neumann, Karen A Grimmer, Yamini Deenadayalan |
| Abstract |
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a prevalent and costly condition which may be treated surgically or by physical therapy. The aim of this review was to systematically assess the literature and present the best available evidence for the efficacy and effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) performed alone and together with adjunctive therapies (eg biofeedback, electrical stimulation, vaginal cones) for the treatment of female SUI. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 231 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 16% |
| Researcher | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 45 | 19% |
| Unknown | 57 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 86 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 61 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2013.
All research outputs
#6,378,944
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#684
of 1,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,921
of 64,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them