↓ Skip to main content

RedeR: R/Bioconductor package for representing modular structures, nested networks and multiple levels of hierarchical associations

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RedeR: R/Bioconductor package for representing modular structures, nested networks and multiple levels of hierarchical associations
Published in
Genome Biology, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/gb-2012-13-4-r29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mauro AA Castro, Xin Wang, Michael NC Fletcher, Kerstin B Meyer, Florian Markowetz

Abstract

Visualization and analysis of molecular networks are both central to systems biology. However, there still exists a large technological gap between them, especially when assessing multiple network levels or hierarchies. Here we present RedeR, an R/Bioconductor package combined with a Java core engine for representing modular networks. The functionality of RedeR is demonstrated in two different scenarios: hierarchical and modular organization in gene co-expression networks and nested structures in time-course gene expression subnetworks. Our results demonstrate RedeR as a new framework to deal with the multiple network levels that are inherent to complex biological systems. RedeR is available from http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/RedeR.html.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 4%
Germany 4 2%
Brazil 4 2%
France 2 1%
Colombia 2 1%
Luxembourg 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 149 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 21%
Student > Master 27 15%
Professor 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 11 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 17%
Computer Science 17 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 7%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 24 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,930,204
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,196
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,748
of 175,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#25
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.