You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A rapid in vitro method to flip back the double-floxed inverted open reading frame in a plasmid
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Biotechnology, August 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12896-018-0462-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jian Xu, Yongling Zhu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
Professor | 3 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 18% |
Unknown | 18 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 21% |
Neuroscience | 10 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,065,009
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#445
of 958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,111
of 339,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.